New Approaches to Marginality in Latin Literature
“gula est: Power dynamics of self-impoverishment through faked illness in Martial’s Epigrams”
Kate Stevens (Rutgers University)
Throughout his Epigrammata, the Flavian poet Martial takes particular care in critiquing the social behavior of other inhabitants (real and imagined) of Rome. His targets behave badly in a number of ways, ranging from miserly patronage to concealment of bodily flaws. I explore how Martial criticizes men who adopt a particular impoverished aesthetic—that of ill health—to enable their abuses of power, exploiting feigned illnesses to manipulate their social positions for profit.
In a number of poems [2.16, 2.40, 9.85, 11.86, 12.56], Martial repeats a scenario: he accuses a man of malingering for the purpose of enjoying unearned social and monetary benefits such as well-wishing and gifts. These men take on similar forms of contrived illness that are aesthetically similar: their symptoms are fevers, listlessness, and coughs, and their illnesses are acute (rather than chronic), potentially fatal (where recovery is cause for celebration), and not visually disfiguring (without perceivable lasting impairment). In contrast, there are two poems where the subject falsifies illness with applications of ointments and bandages [7.39, 10.22]. Martial notably does not attack the greed of these individuals, respectively identified as Caelius and Martial himself. Unlike those faking fever, Caelius and Martial utilize a visibly ill aesthetic not to demand sympathetic gifts but to avoid unpleasant social responsibilities to those with equal or higher status. I argue that Martial targets healthy individuals appropriating the aesthetics of disease to exert social power over others, using these examples to demonstrate that the impoverished aesthetic of illness—as appropriated by wealthy malingerers—can be a tool used to exploit social norms and inappropriately subvert the expected flow of generosity. His treatment of men who feign illness is not uniform, but highly dependent upon how they manipulate their presentation of (ill) health to optimize their position.
Adamik, Tamás. “The System and Function of Attributes in Martial’s Epigrams.” AUB Sect. Class. 7 (1979): 71–85.
Galán Vioque, Guillermo. Martial, Book VII. A Commentary. Translated by J. J. Zoltowski. Brill, 2001.
Garland, Robert. The Eye of the Beholder: Deformity and Disability in the Graeco-Roman World. 2nd ed. Bristol Classical Press, 2010.
Gevaert, Bert. Parcere personis, dicere de vitiis: Deformitas in de epigrammen van Publius Valerius Martialis (unpublished PhD, Brussels, 2013).
———. “Perfect Roman Bodies: The Stoic View.” In Disability in Antiquity, ed. Laes, 213–21. Routledge, 2017.
Henriksén, Christer. A Commentary on Martial: Epigrams, Book 9. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Kay, N.M. Martial, Book XI: A Commentary. Duckworth, 1985.
Laes, Christian, ed. Disability in Antiquity. Routledge, 2017.
Laes, Christian, C.F. Goodey, and M. Lynn Rose. “Approaching Disabilities a Capite ad Calcem: Hidden Themes in Roman Antiquity.” In Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite Ad Calcem, eds. Laes, Goodey, and Rose, 1–16. Brill, 2013.
———, eds. Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite Ad Calcem. Brill, 2013.
Moreno Soldevila, Rosario, Alberto Marina Castillo, and Juan Fernández Valverde, eds. A Prosopography to Martial’s Epigrams. De Gruyter, 2019.
Nauta, Ruurd. Poetry for Patrons. Brill, 2002.
Scarborough, John. “Romans and Physicians.” CJ 65, no. 7 (1970): 296–306.
Spisak, Art. Martial: A Social Guide. Bristol Classical Press, 2007.
Stahl, Johannes. “Physically Deformed and Disabled People.” In Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, 715–33. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Williams, Craig A. Martial: Epigrams Book Two. Oxford University Press, 2004.